Unofficial rules of the sermon
I have a some unofficial rules of the sermon. Here are a few:
- Never talk about the process of writing the sermon explicitly in the sermon.
- If you’re going to explain something about the Greek or Hebrew word, do it in such a way that people don’t notice you’re talking about the Greek or Hebrew word.
- Same as #2 regarding theological terms. (In other words, talk theology, but define unclear terms not by saying, “The definition is…” but by writing beautiful sentences that describe it.)
- Don’t use the sermon as a platform to validate your sense of calling.
There are more rules, some that I’m not sure I can articulate yet, but 10 years after taking my first preaching class, these are some of the ones I know I try to abide by.
On Sunday, I think I’m going to completely and totally smash #1 to pieces. I’m guest preaching at the congregation that might well be most important in teaching me how to preach (Hope CRC where I did my internship in 2002-03). And the only way I can figure out how to structure this one is by talking about the process of writing it and the actual structure.
I’m not sure this is a good portent for the sermon. I think this might work. I’d rather not second guess myself because I don’t want to write the thing twice. Then again, Thursday and Fridays and Saturdays before I preach are always low points for me. We’ll see.
(Come, Holy Spirit…)
I guess I disagree with rule #1–though I don’t disagree with the others.
I think sometimes sermons about the process take us all to a unique place of understanding about how one gets to a particular exegetical point. But my rule is this: use this sparingly—like once a year, tops. And sermons that WHINE about the process–nope.
Good luck with the sermon. I think you’re allowed the once a year exception.
2 January 2009 at 7:16 pm
I’m hoping it’ll be a once in every 5 year exception.
2 January 2009 at 8:49 pm